<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <nonSort>The </nonSort>
    <title>case for contention</title>
    <subTitle>teaching controversial issues in American schools</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Zimmerman, Jonathan</namePart>
    <namePart type="date">1961-</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart> Robertson, Emily</namePart>
    <namePart type="termsOfAddress">(Philosopher of education)</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="marc">bibliography</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">ilu</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2017</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>122 pages ; 24 cm</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>From the fights about the teaching of evolution to the details of sex education, it may seem like American schools are hotbeds of controversy. But as [the author's demonstrate], it is precisely because such topics are so inflammatory outside school walls that they are so commonly avoided within them. And this, they argue, is a tremendous disservice to our students. Armed with a ... history of the development of American educational policy and norms and a clear philosophical analysis of the value of contention in public discourse, they show that one of the best things American schools should do is face controversial topics dead on, right in their classrooms. [The authors] highlight an aspect of American politics that we know all too well: We are terrible at having informed, reasonable debates. We opt instead to hurl insults and accusations at one another or, worse, sit in silence and privately ridicule the other side. Wouldn't an educational system that focuses on how to have such debates in civil and mutually respectful ways improve our public culture and help us overcome the political impasses that plague us today? To realize such a system, the authors argue that we need to not only better prepare our educators for the teaching of hot-button issues, but also provide them the professional autonomy and legal protection to do so. And we need to know exactly what constitutes a controversy, which is itself a controversial issue. The existence of climate change, for instance, should not be subject to discussion in schools: scientists overwhelmingly agree that it exists. How we prioritize it against other needs, such as economic growth, however--that is worth a debate. [The authors] show that our squeamishness over controversy in the classroom has left our students woefully underserved as future citizens. But they also show that we can fix it: if we all just agree to disagree, in an atmosphere of mutual respect.</abstract>
  <tableOfContents>Introduction: the controversy over controversial issues -- Historical reflections: teacher freedom and controversial issues -- Philosophical reflections: exploring the ideal of teaching controversial issues -- Conclusion: policy and practice in teaching controversial issues.</tableOfContents>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Jonathan Zimmerman and Emily Robertson.</note>
  <note>Includes bibliographical references (pages 103-116) and index.</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Teaching, Freedom of</topic>
    <geographic>United States</geographic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Teaching</topic>
    <topic>Political aspects</topic>
    <geographic>United States</geographic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Education</topic>
    <geographic>United States</geographic>
    <topic>Philosophy</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Democracy and education</topic>
    <geographic>United States</geographic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Libertad de enseñanza</topic>
    <geographic>Estados Unidos</geographic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Enseñanza</topic>
    <topic>Aspectos políticos</topic>
    <geographic>Estados Unidos</geographic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Educación</topic>
    <geographic>Estados Unidos</geographic>
    <topic>Filosofía</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Educación y democracia</topic>
    <geographic>Estados Unidos</geographic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="lcc">LC 72.2 Z72c 2017</classification>
  <classification authority="ddc">371.1/04</classification>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>History and philosophy of education series (University of Chicago Press)</title>
    </titleInfo>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="isbn">9780226456348 (paper : alk. paper)</identifier>
  <identifier type="isbn">022645634X (paper : alk. paper)</identifier>
  <identifier type="isbn" invalid="yes"/>
  <identifier type="lccn">2016036890</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">ICU/DLC</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">160811</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20251113172956.0</recordChangeDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="BJBSDDR">19229662</recordIdentifier>
    <languageOfCataloging>
      <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
    </languageOfCataloging>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
