<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Pseudoscience</title>
    <subTitle>an amusing history of crackpot ideas and why we love them</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Kang, Lydia</namePart>
    <namePart type="date">1971-</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Pedersen, Nate</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="marc">bibliography</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">nyu</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2025</dateIssued>
    <edition>First edition.</edition>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>x, 309 pages :  illustrations (some color) ;  21 cm.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>"The Bermuda Triangle. Personality tests. Ghost hunting. Crop circles. Mayan Doomsday. What do all these have in common? None can quite live up the rigor of actual facts or science and yet they all attract passionate supporters anyway. Divided into broad sections covering the easily disproved to the wildly speculative to wishful thinking and of course hucksterism, Pseudoscience is a romp through much more than bad science-it's a light-hearted look into why we insist on believing in things such as Big Foot, astrology, and the existence of aliens. Did you know, for example, that you can tell a person's future by touching their butt? Rumpology. It's a thing, but not really. Or that Stanley Kubrick made a fake moon landing film for the US government? Except he didn't. Or that spontaneous human combustion is real? It ain't, but it can be explained scientifically"-- Provided by publisher.</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Lydia Kang, Nate Pedersen.</note>
  <note>Includes bibliographical references and index.</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Pseudoscience</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Pseudociencia</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Quacks and quackery</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Charlataneria</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="lcc">Q 172.5 K16p 2025</classification>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="23/eng/20241212">001.9/6</classification>
  <identifier type="isbn">9781523524259 (hardcover)</identifier>
  <identifier type="isbn">1523524251 (hardcover)</identifier>
  <identifier type="isbn" invalid="yes"/>
  <identifier type="lccn">2024034848</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DLC</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">241212</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260902135828.0</recordChangeDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="BJBSDDR">23950162</recordIdentifier>
    <languageOfCataloging>
      <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
    </languageOfCataloging>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
