02018cam a2200409La 4500 69256 69256 BJBSDDR 20230410124007.0 ta 080723s2009 mau ob 001 0 eng d 9780674032668 0674032667 (OCoLC)ocn649915446 (OCoLC)649915446 E7B E7B spa eng GRAL LB 2333 L234h 2009 378.1/2 Lamont, Michéle, 1957- How professors think : inside the curious world of academic judgment / Michéle Lamont. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 2009. 330 p. ; 22 cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. 289-315) and index. Opening the black box of peer review -- How panels work -- On disciplinary cultures -- Pragmatic fairness : customary rules of deliberation -- Recognizing various kinds of excellence -- Considering interdisciplinarity and diversity -- Implications in the United States and abroad. Judging quality isn't robotically rational; it's emotional, cognitive, and social, too. Yet most academics' self-respect is rooted in their ability to analyze complexity and recognize quality, in order to come to the fairest decisions about that elusive god, "excellence." In How Professors Think, Lamont aims to illuminate the confidential process of evaluation and to push the gatekeepers to both better understand and perform their role. --from publisher description. College teachers Rating of. Peer review. Teacher effectiveness. Portfolios in education. Profesores universitarios 14081 Evaluación Formación profesional de maestros 1080 Eficacia docente 14082 Portafolios en educación 14083 ebrary, Inc. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10399446 ebrary lcc BK 0 0 0 0 HU BJB BJB HU 2023-04-10 0 LB 2333 L234h 2009 00000077229 2018-10-25 00:00:00 1 2018-10-25 BK