03489cam a2200373 i 4500001000700000003000800007005001700015007000300032008004100035010001700076020003800093020003500131020003900166020003500205040000800240041001300248050002300261082000800284100003500292240002800327245012300355264004600478300002300524504005100547505056600598520171101164650002302875650002502898650001602923650003302939650003402972650005203006650005703058125718BJBSDDR20240109153947.0ta140905t20152015mau b 001 0 eng  a 2014026157 a9780745664941 (pbk. : alk. paper) a0745664946 (pbk. : alk. paper) a 9780745664934 (hbk. : alk. paper) a0745664938 (hbk. : alk. paper) cDLC1 aenghfre14aB 2430bS855s 201500a1941 aStiegler, Bernard, d1952-202010aEtats de choc.lEnglish10aStates of shock :bstupidity and knowledge in the twenty-first century /cBernard Stiegler ; translated by Danie Ross. 1aCambridge ;aMalden, MA :bPolity,c2015. a280 pages ;c24 cm aIncludes bibliographical references and index.0 aPharmacology of stupidity : introduction to the poststructuralist epoch. Unreason Doing and saying stupid things in the twentieth century Différance and repetition : thinking différance as individuation Après coup, the differend Reading and re-reading Hegel after poststructuralism Re-reading the Grundrisse : beyond two Marxist and poststructuralist misunderstandings The university with conditions. The new responsibilities of the university : in the global economic war Internation and interscience Interscience, intergeneration and university autonomy aIn 1944 Horkheimer and Adorno warned that industrial society turns reason into rationalization, and Polanyi warned of the dangers of the self-regulating market, but today, argues Stiegler, this regression of reason has led to societies dominated by unreason, stupidity and madness. However, philosophy in the second half of the twentieth century abandoned the critique of political economy, and poststructuralism left its heirs helpless and disarmed in face of the reign of stupidity and an economic crisis of global proportions. New theories and concepts are required today to think through these issues. The thinkers of poststructuralism Lyotard, Deleuze, Derrida must be re-read, as must the sources of their thought, Hegel and Marx. But we must also take account of Naomi Klein's critique of Milton Friedman and the Chicago School and her account of the shock doctrine. In fact, argues Stiegler, a permanent state of shock has prevailed since the beginning of the industrial revolution, intensified by the creative destruction brought about by the consumerist model. The result has been a capitalism that destroys desire and reason and in which every institution is undermined, above all those institutions that are the products par excellence of the Enlightenment the education system and universities. Through a powerful critique of thinkers from Marx to Derrida, Stiegler develops new conceptual weapons to fight this destruction. He argues that schools and universities must themselves be transformed: new educational institutions must be developed both to take account of the dangers of digitization and the internet and to enable us to take advantage of the new opportunities they make available. 0aPoststructuralism. 4aPostestructuralismo  4aFilosofía 0aEducation and globalization. 4aEducación y globalización 0aKnowledge, Sociology ofxHistoryy21st century. 4aSociología del conocimiento xHistoria ySiglo XXI