Justice abandoned : how the Supreme Court ignored the Constitution and enabled mass incarceration / Rachel Elise Barkow.
Material type:
TextLanguage: English Publisher: Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 2025Description: 311 pages ; 24 cmContent type: - text
- unmediated
- volume
- 9780674294226 (cloth)
- 067429422X (cloth)
- United States. Supreme Court
- Estados Unidos. Corte Suprema
- Mass incarceration -- United States
- Encarcelamiento -- Estados Unidos
- Imprisonment -- United States
- Arrest -- United States
- Detención -- Estados Unidos
- Plea bargaining -- United States
- Sentences (Criminal procedure) -- United States
- Sentencias (Procedimiento penal) -- Estados Unidos
- Prisons -- Overcrowding -- Law and legislation -- United States
- Prisiones -- Hacinamiento -- Legislación -- Estados Unidos
- Stop and frisk (Law enforcement) -- Law and legislation -- United States
- Detenciones y cacheos -- Legislación -- Estados Unidos
- Racism in criminal justice administration -- United States
- 345.73/0773
- KF 9728 B256j 2025
| Item type | Current library | Home library | Collection | Shelving location | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Libro
|
Biblioteca Juan Bosch | Biblioteca Juan Bosch | Ciencias Sociales | Ciencias Sociales (3er. Piso) | KF 9728 B256j 2025 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 00000190504 |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Lowering the Bar for Pretrial Detention : United States v. Salerno
Normalizing Coercive Plea Bargaining : Bordenkircher v. Hayes
Upholding Disproportionate Sentences : Harmelin v. Michigan
Tolerating Overcrowded Prisons : Rhodes v. Chapman
Greenlighting Stop-and-Frisk : Terry v. Ohio
Overlooking Pervasive Racial Bias : McCleskey v. Kemp
"Since the 1960s, the Supreme Court has enabled mass incarceration through rulings that violate constitutional curbs on pretrial detention, coercive plea bargaining, excessive sentences, and other forms of state overreach. Detailing their flaws, Rachel Barkow argues that a Court committed to constitutional rights must overturn these precedents"-- Provided by publisher.
There are no comments on this title.
