000 02942cam a2200409 a 4500
001 125108
005 20230410123409.0
008 110120s2011 enk b 001 0 eng
035 _a16616623
925 0 _aacquire
_b2 shelf copies
_xpolicy default
942 _2lcc
_cbk
010 _a 2011002457
020 _a9781107005150 (hardback)
020 _a1107005159 (hardback)
035 _a(OCoLC)ocn694393898
040 _aDLC
_cDLC
_dYDX
_dBTCTA
_dYDXCP
_dBWK
_dCDX
_dBWX
_dRCJ
_dDLC
041 _aeng
042 _apcc
043 _aa-is---
_aa-ii---
_ae-ie---
050 1 4 _aK 3165
_bL616m 2011
082 0 0 _a342.02
100 1 _aLerner, Hanna.
245 1 0 _aMaking constitutions in deeply divided societies /
_cHanna Lerner.
260 _aCambridge ;
_aNew York :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2011.
300 _aix, 262 p. ;
_c24 cm.
520 _a"How can societies still grappling over the common values and shared vision of their state draft a democratic constitution? This is the central puzzle of Making Constitutions in Deeply Divided Societies. While most theories discuss constitution-making in the context of a moment of revolutionary change, Hanna Lerner argues that an incrementalist approach to constitution-making can enable societies riven by deep internal disagreements to either enact a written constitution or function with an unwritten one. She illustrates the process of constitution-writing in three deeply divided societies - Israel, India and Ireland - and explores the various incrementalist strategies deployed by their drafters. These include the avoidance of clear decisions, the use of ambivalent legal language and the inclusion of contrasting provisions in the constitution. Such techniques allow the deferral of controversial choices regarding the foundational aspects of the polity to future political institutions, thus enabling the constitution to reflect a divided identity"--
_cProvided by publisher.
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 235-257) and index.
505 8 _aMachine generated contents note: Part I. Constitutions, Democracy, Identity: 1. Introduction; 2. Three paradigms of democratic constitutions; 3. The incrementalist approach to constitution-making; Part II. Varieties of Constitutional Incrementalism: 4. Informal consociationalism in Israel; 5. Constructive ambiguity in India; 6. Symbolic ambivalence in Ireland; Part III. For and Against Constitutional Incrementalism: 7. Normative arguments for constitutional incrementalism; 8. Potential dangers; 9. Conclusion.
650 0 _aConstitutional law
_zIsrael.
650 0 _aConstitutional law
_zIndia.
650 0 _aConstitutional law
_zIreland.
650 4 _aDerecho constitucional
_zIsrael.
650 4 _aDerecho constitucional
_zIndia.
650 4 _aDerecho constitucional
_zIrlanda.
856 4 2 _3Cover image
_uhttp://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/05150/cover/9781107005150.jpg
946 _adpf
999 _c60596
_d60596